[WHL] Re: Question about usage of C-number and M-number
adrian at xemacs.org
Tue Nov 2 03:48:50 EST 2004
"Ben Wing" <ben at 666.com> writes:
> This link appears broken:
Have this one instead:
> In any case, adrian, which [if either] do you use for digit-argument?
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Adrian Aichner [mailto:adrian at xemacs.org]
>> Sent: Monday, November 01, 2004 6:07 PM
>> To: Ben Wing; Johann Myrkraverk Oskarsson
>> Cc: 'XEmacs Beta'
>> Subject: [WHL] Re: Question about usage of C-number and M-number
>> "Ben Wing" <ben at 666.com> writes:
>> > I have made up some very useful functions which make it easy to cut
>> > and paste to registers. The idea is that C-num copies text to the
>> > specified register and M-num pastes the text. C-M-num appends to a
>> > register, and adding S- to either C- or C-M- cuts instead
>> of copying.
>> > I've written these so that the use of C-num does not interfere with
>> > its use for digit-argument, since it only takes effect when
>> a region
>> > is active.
>> > I'm thinking of putting these into XEmacs, but I want to know:
>> > Do people tend to use C-num or M-num for digit-argument? I
>> can revise
>> > the keybindings so that either one remains, but I'd like to know
>> > current usage.
>> Ben, could you please also review
>> which might not be entirely unrelated.
>> I am refering to the gmane archives, because I can't figure
>> out how to hit this in our own :-(
>> The patch proposes to support numbered access to windows in XEmacs.
>> I have run with this patch since then and haven't seen any
>> problems with this.
>> Best regards,
>> Adrian Aichner
>> mailto:adrian at xemacs.org
mailto:adrian at xemacs.org
More information about the XEmacs-Beta