Speed difference in Gnus
hniksic at xemacs.org
Thu Oct 13 17:52:36 EDT 2005
Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane at imap.cc> writes:
> Then `M-RET' should be significantly faster, shouldn't it?
I don't think so. The majority of time is not lost in either
highlighting or scoring.
I even profiled the `insert's to see if Gnus was doing something
nasty with inserting to temporary buffers, but it wasn't, it was just
inserting to (what will become) the Summary buffer.
> `C-u 0 M-RET' probably doesn't use insert so often.
It has to because it still has to create the buffer. The insert
function inserts string into the buffer.
> PS: Cc-ing ding. This might be interesting for Gnus developers.
Not really. This is primarily a problem with XEmacs.
More information about the XEmacs-Beta