Speed difference in Gnus

Hrvoje Niksic hniksic at xemacs.org
Thu Oct 13 17:52:36 EDT 2005


Reiner Steib <reinersteib+gmane at imap.cc> writes:

> Then `M-RET' should be significantly faster, shouldn't it?

I don't think so.  The majority of time is not lost in either
highlighting or scoring.

I even profiled the `insert's to see if Gnus was doing something
nasty with inserting to temporary buffers, but it wasn't, it was just
inserting to (what will become) the Summary buffer.

> `C-u 0 M-RET' probably doesn't use insert so often.

It has to because it still has to create the buffer.  The insert
function inserts string into the buffer.

> PS: Cc-ing ding.  This might be interesting for Gnus developers.

Not really.  This is primarily a problem with XEmacs.




More information about the XEmacs-Beta mailing list