Problem with new configure?

[Steve Youngs]

* Malcolm Purvis <malcolmp at xemacs.org> writes:

  > --with-error-checking=noextents,notypes,notext,nogc,nomalloc,nobyte_code,noglyphs,nodisplay,nostructures

Could `--with-error-checking=none' and `--with-error-checking=all' be
acceptable too?  I think they used to be, didn't they?

-- 
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
|                 I am Dyslexic of Borg.                   | 
|    Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated.    |
|------------------------------------<steve at sxemacs.org>---|
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 256 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://calypso.tux.org/pipermail/xemacs-beta/attachments/20051024/6d25f4f0/attachment.bin