[PATCH] Abstract out a display-table-specific API (2)

[Aidan Kehoe]

 Ar an triochadú lá de mí na Nollaig, scríobh Stephen J. Turnbull: 

 > QUERY
 > 
 > Aidan Kehoe writes:
 > 
 >  > 	* gamegrid.el (put-display-table): New.
 >  > 	* gamegrid.el (get-display-table): New.
 >  > 	Provide with #'defun-when-void, so as to not override the 21.5
 >  > 	implementation. 
 > 
 > Is there any chance you could name these `display-table-get' and
 > `display-table-put'?  Yes, I know there's precedent for the prefix
 > form in `puthash' and `put-char-table' (and others), but `hash' can be
 > read as the object (ie, the key), and put-char-table and friends have
 > always made me ask "where should we put the char-table?"  There's
 > plenty of precedent for the postfix form (C-h a -put$ RET will give a
 > list), and it's more Lisp-y.

Not emacs-Lisp-y, though (F1 a ^put- RET vs F1 a -put$ RET): 

put-alist
put-case-table
put-case-table-pair
put-char-code-property
put-char-table
put-charset-property
put-database
put-nonduplicable-text-property
put-range-table
put-text-property

vs:

coding-system-put
lax-plist-put
overlay-put
plist-put
widget-put

-- 
¿Dónde estará ahora mi sobrino Yoghurtu Nghé, que tuvo que huir
precipitadamente de la aldea por culpa de la escasez de rinocerontes?