Identify XEmacs build from Mercurial changeset

[Stephen J. Turnbull]

APPROVE

Er, the big bug I'm referring to is lack of any hg identifier in the
version string.  Please commit anything that doesn't break the build
and does get a reasonable facsimile of the hg revision hash into the
version string for a clone of the repo. :-)  We can worry about
improving the definition of which hash we want for non-clones, and
making the interface more elegant, later.

Stephen J. Turnbull writes:
 > Michael Sperber writes:
 > 
 >  > I wasn't trying to be rhetorical: This is the best I could come up
 >  > with.
 > 
 > I'm not either.  I have no idea how to do better on Windows, either.
 > My intention is not to veto the patch, this is a big bug and it needs
 > to be fixed.  I'm trying to see (a) if it can be done better *now*
 > (which doesn't look likely), and (b) how much we know that would be of
 > use in moving forward with improvements *later*.  I know nothing about
 > how xemacs.mak works. :(
 > 
 > _______________________________________________
 > XEmacs-Patches mailing list
 > XEmacs-Patches at xemacs.org
 > http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-patches