beginning-of-defun bug

[Andreas Roehler]

Michael Sperber wrote:
> Andreas Roehler <andreas.roehler at online.de> writes:
> 
>>> I'm getting worried that you keep churning out patch after patch.  How
>>> about you figure out where you want to go,
>> Did I change the path? Can't see that. Presented a study already,
>> "Simplifying..", where you could look at these change already.
> 
> Well, all these changes affect about 10 lines of code and, as far as I
> can see, a single feature.  They're all in a very short amount of time.
> So, yes, I'd say that you're changing what you want to see done.  If
> you'd developed what you want over one or two weeks, you maybe could
> have presented us with a single patch that would do all of what you
> want, rather than a series of them, all of which we're currently wasting
> time reviewing.
> 

Sorry, but that's simply the wrong strategy in such a case.
As Steve's veto shows, the case is complicated enough already.
No need to enhance complexity.